(Although we might be rescheduling our next meeting, allow me to use the original designated date for the title.)
On Monday, the Supreme Court of the United States affirms the constitutionality of a law that bars providing "material support" to terrorist organizations, despite challenges alleging violations of free speech. You might wonder: Why would freedom of speech have anything to do with aiding terrorists?
The following articles introduce the linkage between the two concepts, as well as the opinion of the Justices, both the majority and dissent.
Before Justices, First Amendment and Aid to Terrorists (briefly documenting the debate taking place before the Court)
Supreme Court Upholds Anti-Terror Law (reporting on the outcome of the case)
In our next meeting, we could talk about whether we agree with the majority opinion, if the human rights activists are in fact asking too much, and, more generally, if anti-terrorism measures taken by states have gone too far.
Lastly, just something on the sidebar, the text of the First Amendment is as follows:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
Although the whole thing might seem a bit "legal," nevertheless, I hope you find it relevant. =)
See you in a few days!
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment